Introduction: Assessment is an important aspect of teaching and learning. It provides a measure of student performance (assessment of learning), but perhaps more importantly is also an import part of the learning process (assessment for learning). However, choosing appropriate assessments is a complex process.
Key considerations in designing an assessment include how formative and summative assessment will be incorporated in a unit, how they enable students to demonstrate achivement of unit learning outcomes, and how they contribute to wider programme learning outcomes. It is also important that programmes incorporate a range of assessments so all students have an opportunity to demonstrate their achievement and have an opportunity to engage in discipline- and profession-relevant tasks. The above can be supported and enhanced through the use of technology enhanced learning (TEL) and assessment tools.
There are many forms of assessment, which can be included in a programme to help achieve the above principles. To help ensure a balance of assessment on a programme, BU categorises assessment into four types: writing, speaking, doing and making. These are not mutually exclusive categories and a single assessment, such as a Mahara eportfolio or a dissertation, may encompass activities that align with all four types.
Each type is summarised below:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Acknowledgement:
UNWS Selecting Assessment Methods. https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/printpdf/588
References:
Crisp, G.T. (2010). Integrative assessment: reframing assessment practice for current and future learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 37(1), 33–43.
Hughes, C. (2009). Assessment as text production: drawing on systemic functional linguistics to frame the design and analysis of assessment tasks. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34(5), 553–563.
Nightingale, P., Te Wiata, I., Toohey, S., Ryan, G., Hughes, C. and Magin, D. (1996). Assessing learning in universities. University of New South Wales and Committee for Advancement of University Teaching.
Winter, R. (2003). Contextualising the patchwork text: Addressing problems of coursework assessment in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 40(2), 112–122
Articles for Different Audiences |
Design / Production Assignment |
|
|
Matching Learning Outcomes to Assessment Options | |
---|---|
Learning Outcomes / Graduate Attributes | Examples of Assignments and Assessments |
learning how to communicate information and ideas orally or in mixed-media form to a 'live' audience | seminar, poster, video, screencast or other multimedia presentation |
developing a 'sense of audience' - tailoring a message to the needs and interests of a paprticular group | a report on a community project, talks to school pupils, a guide for the public |
gaining experience of working on set questions and problems under pressure, but with time to reflect and to draw on notes | take-home or 24-hour exams, seen questions, open-book tests |
learning how to plan, implement, analyse and report on a substantial inquiry, experiment or initiative | major and extended projects or dissertations |
acquiring expertise in carrying out everyday academic / study tasks by using C&IT applications commonly fould in professional workplaces | spreadsheets; databases; slide and poster design software; project planning ; web design; online surveys |
becoming accomplished at recording and reflecting on an ongoing task or activity | fieldwork, placement, studio or lab diaries and logs; portfolios; workbooks |
honing skills in debate and discussion and the interchange of information and ideas on-line | contributions to a webboard / on-line forum, responses to what others have posted |
becoming more adept at writing in a range of formats and 'genres' typical of a subject area or professional practice | designs / proposals; book reviews; case scenarios; web pages; newsletter |
becoming skilled at judging quality, giving constructive feedback, and suggesting improvements | peer-feedback and peer-feedforward on a written assignment or presentation |
first-hand experience of the benefits and challenges of workign collaboratively and learning from other team-members | team problem-solving, group wikis, co-presentations, collaborative exhibitions |
to learn how to review, edit and enhance ongoing work in response to feedback from others | ongoing proposals or plans; patchwork texts; an online journal; a wiki entry |
ADAPTED FROM: Hounsell, D., Xu, R. and Tai, C.M. (2007). Blending Assignments and Assessments for High-Quality Learning (Scottish Enhancement Themes: Guides to Interactive Assessment, no. 3). Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. ISBN 978 1 8 4482 649 0. http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/IntegrativeAssessment |
CEMP 2025